TwinTurbo.NET: Nissan 300ZX forum - not that I'm a turbo expert, but it seems 3" would be better
People Seeking Info
 
   


     
Subject not that I'm a turbo expert, but it seems 3" would be better
     
Posted by my91z on February 21, 2002 at 3:33 PM
  This message has been viewed 46 times.
     
In Reply To Way too big...exhaust gases will have more turbulence>> posted by Seb on February 21, 2002 at 03:09 PM
     
Message from an engineering standpoint. The exhaust gasses exiting the turbo's are anything but laminar already, and you are probabaly way into the turbulent regeime where increasing turbulence probably won't do much for lowering your friction factor, as the curves on the Moody diagram level out after about a Reynold's number of 10^5 no matter what e/D ratio you have.

But, as you decrease the diameter you increase your "q" for the same flow rate. And pressure drop = k*q with k being a function of radius of bend over pipe diameter for bends. You get a similar "k" for area changes(such as at the flanges, etc, or when the exhaust "dumps" into the canister section of an OE exhaust)

So, reduced diameter would cause more backpressure on the turbo's from the bends and area changes, even if the straight line friction drops marginally, causing the turbo's to pump less air overall.

Like I said, I'm no turbo expert, but at first glamce bigger would seem to be better for your flow. You could do some fairly straighforward calculations to show which *should* be better analytically.

Mike

------------------------------------------------------
Click here to e-mail me!Click here for Twin Turbo Zs of Dallas!

     
Follow Ups  
     
Post a
Followup

You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.